This group is dedicated to knowledge sharing and discussion of infrared thermography for building sciences and energy applications.

201 Members
Join Us!

You need to be a member of Building Performance Community to add comments!

Join Building Performance Community


  • Thanks so much.  Very, very helpful.

  • OK!  Qualitative by definition require a blower door. Without you are doing Quantitative.

    Where is the sun in relation to your image? What time of day? To follow the various testing standards for judging the Grade of Insulation you must have images taken with no blower door going and a ∆T of 18° F or more for 12 hours. I always do these within 30 minutes of local sunrise. Then you run the blower door, and re-image 100% of the walls again. Take the images before and after and tweak them on the computer. 

    Tweaks:  Remember the camera assumes you are equally interested in the lowest temperature in the frame and the highest temp and each temp in between.  You are not. Adjust the Level and Span so you can isolate the area of interest in each image. As you adjust these you will see your image change. Try changing the color palette. 

    You are aware how the colors in the image change as you look at a wall, and then move the camera to include a light bulb or a mirror, right?  Changing the level and span has the same type of effect. 

    If your image has a low temp of 35, due to a wet washcloth; and a high temperature of 95 because there is a GFI or an active electronic device.  The span is set by auto from 35 - 95.  It sounds like you want a span of 15°.  The level may set that span at 52 - 67 or 60 - 75.  It will show a whole lot more of what you want.

    When you compare your two sets of images, you will be better equipped to see an area the lift did not fully fill the cavity in an area; COMPARED to a more pinpoint area that is actually a hole and sucking air.  

    I would not get too concerned about a few places you are seeing an low area which you would call R-12 with no drywall in the way; compared to a full lift of R-14. A few places say less than 5% of the wall area total.  

    Use the Square Inches of ELA with your Blower Door results and the number of pinholes; you will then be able to justify your call on the fixes or no fixes. 

    Remember the extra $$ charged by the contractor is always sold as air sealing in addition to the insulation. So providing a Blower Door Print out to the contractor for the builder helps the quality control.  You can also figure the ASHRAE 62.2 ventilation rate.

  • I am not certified. Qualitative.  I also have a blower door.  I did not see the install.

    Yes, when there are question...I help find areas of non fill.  Insulator uses this as quality control and o be sure his customers are happy.

    Outside temperature is 27, Inside temperature is 68. Majority of walls are 64.  Non filled cavities were appear around 55F or lower.  However I will get areas of 61 next to areas of 64 ..most pin point  but some larger.   Trying to balance what is actionable with what is not.  

  • As a Lvl II Thermographer with over 5 years of work in both existing and new homes, I am not aware of any Rule of Thumb.  Have you taken a Certification Class?  Are you doing Qualitative or Quantitative IR Inspections?  What other equipment do you have that you use or may use in these inspections?

    Can you describe the size of the temperature fluctuations?  Pinpoint, Are less than 9 inches square, larger areas? Are they relatively warmer or cooler than the surrounding area?  Did you observe the foam install? 

    What are you getting paid to do? I assume the SPF contractor is going to use your inspection as a quality control.  So is it to train his staff, re-do substandard work or to just show the customer paying him that he got a good job?  or more than one?

  • I use my IR Camera to verify work for a Insulator who uses foam to fill the wall cavities.  I am looking for a rule of thumb to help guide me in determining what is or isnt significant.  At what point do I recommend action based on temperature profiles alone. For the mos part easy to tell when a cavity is empty, but often there are temperature fluctuations of a degree or 2.  Not sure if this is foam density difference, cracking etc.  Any guidance would be appreciated.  Outside temps are 30F,.  I take images from the interior.

  • John, yes I would like to push the "Online" as that is what I said. I said it is the "... only provider of Online " . I did not say it is 'the only provider period'. I said it is the only ONLINE provider, who also meets the ASNT SNT-TC-1A recommendations ..." (The "online" part was the key reason for post, so should be the last thing you leave out when trying to disprove my statement. :)

    Whether you question the quality of online training in general, is a different matter altogether, but the quality can't be as bad as you perceive since it  meets the ASNT SNT-TC-1A recommendations. (plus it also qualifies for NETA CTDs, and approved by the International Association of Certified Home Inspectors for 32 hours of continuing education, and other organizations like RCI and CITA continuing education credits)

    I would be the first to step up and state in person instruction is better than online training. That statement is a no brainer, we all should already know. (something like Mr. Obvious would say. :) And I never claimed this online thermography training is better than in person training. Knowing in person training by the right person is better than online training should be 'a given' for the highly educated level of readers here. I was just letting those who didn't already know it, that ...

    if you can't work in-person cost and scheduling into your life, there is an ONLINE IR Infrared training and certification option available that  meets the ASNT SNT-TC-1A recommendations.

    That is all that short comment I previously made was stating. Hope this clarifies it for you John.

  • Don,  You are incorrect!  This is *NOT* the only course available that meets the ASNT requirements.  I've taken both Level I and Level II courses from another training provider that meet the ASNT requirements.  In selecting my training from 2010 through now, I checked out 3 separate providers that meet the requirement. 

    If you wish to push the 'Online' I would seriously question the quality of learning one would obtain.

  • "This is the only provider of Online Infrared Thermography Training course that meet the ASNT SNT-TC-1A recommendations for a 32 hour curriculum." 

  • What does anyone think about these? Do know anything about the specs? 

    IPhone/Android Thermal Imager

  • Does anyone have a recommendation for best level 1 IR training in the Southeast US with emphasis on energy auditing and Energy rating? Thanks

This reply was deleted.
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

Cambridge Home Loan

Find the best rates and learn how home ownership can benefit you. The best Tampa home loans and the best available rates. Have a mortgage professional walk you through the process. Refinance into a lower rate or a longer term to lower your payments. Cash out for home improvements, emergency medical, an investment or other financial needs. Consolidate your debt. Convert the equity in your home into cash that you can use now. Pay it back or never pay it back, your choice. See if you qualify for a…

Read more…
0 Replies

Current thermography standards for CA?

I am specifying IR thermography combined with a blower door test for renovation of a government-owned dormitory in California (Nat'l Park Service). What are the current test standards for thermography? I'm looking at GSA standard specs, which indicate ASTM C1060 (2011a) and ISO 6781 (1983). Are these still current? Does anyone practicing in California actually use these? For the blower door, I am listing Energy Code RA3.8 as an acceptable test protocol (alternate to US Army COE protocol). Is…

Read more…
0 Replies

Having some fun with our cameras know I can't be the only person to just have some fun with thermography LOL.....figured a fun thread couldn't hurt in here.....I am level 2 certified and use a Flir T420, looking forward to seeing what others have (videos or images)Mike Pagozalski--  Certified Home Inspector  

Read more…
2 Replies

New building thermography 360 pages ebook - including blower door and heat flux meter !

Link to buying and pdf preview page: is a rich handbook (over 300 pages in original printed edition, much more in this ebook) about thermography applied to sector of building, that approaches the technique both from a theoric and practical point of view. Thermography is explained with a lot of thermal images as examples for physical consequences of formulae, and case histories of several kind of inspections are developed, from moisture and mold, to…

Read more…
3 Replies